The difference between a "passive spontaneous galvanic set up" and a set up using “an external electrical device"
Updated: 3 hours ago
BeT is a passive spontaneous galvanic set up
The reason why BeT works requires an understanding of the difference between a "passive spontaneous galvanic set up" and a set up using “an external electrical device”.
What actually happens in a passive copper–silver electrode pair
In a spontaneous (passive) copper–silver couple on the skin:
Copper is the anode → it slowly dissolves and releases copper ions (mainly Cu²⁺).
Silver is the cathode → it does not release silver ions in any significant amount.
Electrons flow from the copper electrode toward the silver electrode.
The copper ions migrate through the tissue fluid toward the silver electrode.
This ion and electron movement creates and sustains a small electric field (the galvanic potential difference of roughly 0.45 V) between the two electrodes.
Silver ions do not flow from silver to copper in this setup. That only happens when an external power source or device forces the silver electrode to become the anode, exactly what Becker did. What this means for the BeT healing effect;
The therapeutic factor in our passive BeT system is the direction and presence of the microcurrent / electric field itself. Not free silver ions traveling along the meridians. The electric field is generated by the galvanic pairing. Copper is the active metal that dissolves and supplies the ions and electrons; silver is the necessary noble partner that makes the metal pairing work and establishes the polarity of the field. Without the silver electrode, you would not have the same stable potential difference or the same directional field.
The accurate statement is:
The passive copper–silver pair generates a small galvanic electric field and microcurrent in the meridians-tissue. Copper ions and electrons are the mobile charge carriers that sustain this field. The silver electrode is required to create the potential difference and to determine the polarity/direction of the field through the meridians of the body. The therapeutic effects observed clinically appear to depend on the orientation of this electrical field (and the associated microcurrent) rather than on long-distance transport of free silver ions.
My decades of clinical experience suggests that polarity is critical factor, while correcting the earlier assumption that silver ions were the primary carriers.
Relation to Becker
Becker used an external device specifically to force the silver electrode into the anodic (positive) state so that it would actively release Ag⁺ ions into infected tissue. That is a different mechanism from a passive galvanic pair. BeT does not force silver into the anodic state, so it does not primarily deliver free silver ions the way Becker’s method did. The therapeutic effects are due to the oriented electric field and microcurrent (plus any local electrochemical effects at the acupuncture points) than to systemic or meridian-borne silver ions.
Practical language for teaching and for researchers
Copper-silver galvanic couple (passive)
“In Bio-electrode Therapy we use a passive copper–silver galvanic pair. Copper acts as the anode and releases copper ions; silver acts as the cathode. The resulting microcurrent and electric field are oriented according to the placement of the electrodes on the Jing-Well points. Clinically, the direction of this field is critical — the standard placement produces consistent therapeutic effects, while the reverse exacerbates symptoms. The primary active factor is the oriented electric field and microcurrent.”
Gold–silver galvanic couple (passive)
Silver is the anode → it dissolves and releases silver ions:
Gold is the cathode → it does not dissolve preferentially.
Electrons flow from the silver electrode toward the gold electrode.
The free silver ions (Ag⁺) migrate through the tissue fluid toward the gold electrode.
In this specific pairing, silver ions are the primary active cationic charge carriers generated by the galvanic reaction. The electric field is sustained by the movement of those Ag⁺ ions (and the corresponding electron flow).
Human bodily functions are dependent on electrical factors.
In a recent Pub Med Journal article researchers, M.A. Messerli and D.M. Graham have written:
"Endogenous DC electric fields (EFs) are important, fundamental components of development, regeneration, and wound healing. The fields are the result of polarized
ion transport and current flow through electrically conductive pathways. Nullification of endogenous EFs with pharmacological agents or applied EFs of opposite polarity disturbs the aforementioned processes, while enhancement increases the rate of wound closure and the extent of regeneration. EFs are applied to humans in the clinic, to provide an overwhelming signal for the enhancement of healing of chronic wounds. Although clinical trials, spanning a course of decades, have shown that applied EFs enhance healing of chronic wounds, the mechanisms by which cells sense and respond to these weak cues remains unknown.
EFs are thought to influence many different processes in vivo. However, under more rigorously controlled conditions in vitro, applied EFs induce cellular polarity and direct migration and outgrowth. Here we review the generation of endogenous EFs, the results of their alteration, and the mechanisms by which cells may sense these weak fields. Understanding the mechanisms by which native and applied EFs direct development and repair will enable current and future therapeutic applications to be optimized."


Comments